Archive for February, 2007

Who Was H. P. Lovecraft?

Howard_Phillips_Lovecraft___circa_1916.jpgFor those who came in late, Lovecraft Forest is named for the American writer H. P. Lovecraft.

Howard Phillips Lovecraft (1890-1937) worked mostly during the era of Pulp magazines, publishing frequently from 1905 to 1935. Largely unknown and unappreciated in his own time, his works quickly found a circle of follower and admirers including Robert Bloch, Stephen King, Bentley Little, and Joe R. Lansdale. Many fans of the American horror story look to him as the logical successor of Edgar Allan Poe. He also frequently corresponded with many contemporary writers of the period including August Derleth, Clark Ashton Smith, and Robert E. Howard.

Lovecraft is a complicated writer, heavily influenced by the increasing of scientific, mechanical, and relativistic influences of the time and the subsequent diminishing of religious fervor that marked the preceding years. He stories frequently deal with the horror of a purely nihilistic universe, such as in stories like Herbert West: Reanimator (1922) and disinterested alien gods for which mankind is little more than insects, such as in Call of Cthulhu (1926.) Of my favorite works are the historical pieces of past horrors, such as the magnificent Case of Charles Dexter Ward (1927.) His “Dream Cycle” work (chiefly 1920-27) tend to reflect the influence of Lord Dunsany’s works and features his classic, The Dream-Quest of Unknown Kadath (1926).

2009h.gifHe is also credited with much of the literary philosophy of Cosmicism, which usually holds that the universe lacks a recognizable God and the universe, though potentially populated with other beings, is chiefly indifferent to the activities of human beings. His chief contributions to subsequent horror writers including the Cthulhu mythos and the famous literary device, the infamous book Necronomicon. Development of a fantasy roleplaying game by Chaosium named for Call of the Cthulhu, has introduced Lovecrafts universe to an entirely new generation of fans. Introduced in 1979, the game is now in its 6th edition and celebrating it’s 25th anniversary.

Wikisource_logo.pngAn excellent introduction to Lovecraft can be found the Wikipedia article on his life and work here. Many of his works, now in the public domain, have been made accessible through WikiSource here.

Tags: , , ,

The Haunted Palace (1963)

Theater Poster for “The Haunted Palace”I was recently asked, “do you actually like The Haunted Palace?” (referring to the 1963 Roger Coreman adaption of “The Case of Charles Dexter Ward“) The short answer is, “yes, what’s not to like?” It is well made, stars Vincent Price, has Lon Chaney, Jr. and a host of other veteran character actors and a Ronald Stein score. For marketing reasons, the film was marketed under the much more recognizable, Edgar Allan Poe by linking it to a couple lines from one of his poems (The Haunted Palace, 1839.) The story is clearly derrived from the Case of Charles Dexter Ward, though notably truncated to reduce the complexity of the story for the screen. It is an able adaption, though I miss the arcane horror of raising the ancient dead from their “essential saltes” through alchemy. Many Lovecraft fans, while pleased to see a Lovecraft-based film have critcized the film for its loose adaptation compared to Dan O’Bannon’s more faithful attempt in 1992’s The Ressurected.

Both films offer merit: Coreman’s film makes use of veteran horror actor Vincent Price as the titular character of Ward. Ressurected PosterO’Bannon brings out the grusome nature of Joeseph Curwen’s experiments in raising the dead and what “lively horror” may result from the use of “imprefect saltes.” Both films are done with care and craft of producers and directors that understand their source material and have made a deliberate attempt to get past the difficulties of interpreting the complex supernatural story to the screen. O’Bannon gives us a lot more gore for our money while Coreman makes the most of his crew of Poe-seasoned actors. I have personally seen both films several times, I always marvel at the contrast each director and writer choose to adapt the story that I am so well familiar with. (Those who know me, know that The Case of Charles Dexter Ward has long been among my favorite Lovecraft tales.)

My recommendation? See both and decide for yourself. They are both worth the price of admission and have much to offer the Lovecraft fan.

Tags: